There is no question as to "climate change", it always has been and will always be. The question is the validity of the "science". The prognostications, of these scientist, are all there is to base any validation of their study(s). And those very prognostications/predictions have proven their own failure(s). Along with tales of woe, proven false, and every paper or article rife with "could", "might", "should", "maybe", ad-nauseam, make this "science" at best,..... a farce.
There is no question as to "climate change", it always has been and will always be. The question is the validity of the "science". The prognostications, of these scientist, are all there is to base any validation of their study(s). And those very prognostications/predictions have proven their own failure(s). Along with tales of woe, proven false, and every paper or article rife with "could", "might", "should", "maybe", ad-nauseam, make this "science" at best,..... a farce.