LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+38 38 0
Published 1 year ago with 9 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
Conversation 8 comments by 5 users
  • leweb

    Why do the poor vote for them then? There are many more poor people than rich people. The Republicans wouldn't win if the poor voted against them.

    If they vote for them, then why do they complain? It's not like Republicans haven't been like this for a long time.

    • LisMan

      Bill Moyers was President Lyndon A Johnson's press secretary. According to Moyers', this is how Johnson explained the phenomena: We were in Tennessee. During a motorcade, the President spotted some ugly racial epithets scrawled on signs by a few plain, he called them homely, white women on the edge of the crowd. Late that night in the hotel, long past midnight, he was still going on about how poor whites and poor blacks had been kept apart so that they could separately be fleeced-. ''I'll tell you what's at the bottom of it," he said. "If you can convince the lowest white man that he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll even empty his pockets for you." http://www.digitalnpq.org/archive/1987_winter/second.html

    • AdelleChattre

      You assume the poor realize they’re poor, and not temporarily-embarrassed billionaires.

      • leweb

        Ah, that explains it, of course!

        Seriously, the problem with Democracy is that most people are too stupid to vote. People don't deserve Democracy.

        • AdelleChattre

          Cynicism unclear. Please clarify, do you mean that people are too stupid to bother voting or is it people are too stupid to vote well? I'm still watching Season Five of the HBO program The Wire, so I don't quite have all the answers yet, but I'm pretty sure I remember something about education being as much the responsibility of the democratic state as a democratic people.

          Not that choosing between political brand 'A' and brand 'B' constitutes a democracy in the first place, mind you. Let alone voting for a figurehead from either 'A' or 'B' when what we really need is options one, two, three and Medicare for All.

          • leweb

            I mean people are too stupid to make decisions about who should lead them. You're right that there isn't really much of a choice, but presumably if you're poor and depend on social programs to survive, when faced with two crappy options, one of which is guaranteed to eliminate those programs, you'd choose the other, right?

            • Gozzin

              That would seem logical,yes.

          • Appaloosa


            I think he meant voting well. I don't think he is coming from am elitist position, unlike many others, even those landed gentry who founded the US.

Here are some other snaps you may like...