• AdelleChattre (edited 8 years ago)
    +7

    It’s the little things that trip you up when you comment without having read the article. It wasn’t a politician that decided to save <~$36K by racking up a ~$1.5B+ disaster. A politician would have to answer for that. No, this was emergency managers. You know, dictatorial strongmen that answer to no one. Someone put in place of any elected representative by higher ups. People that, at best, get paid the same whether people get widespread irreversible brain damage and lethal, easily-prevented disease outbreaks or not. My suggestion for you is to take all the time you need to read the article, ask yourself what you should be taking away from having read it, know something about what you’re talking about and, I promise, you’ll be glad you did. Couldn’t hurt to edit, some, either.

    • [Deleted Profile]

      [This comment was removed]