Unfunded "trust fund"=insolvency since 2010 when Social Security started to pay out more than it took in
The "Trust Fund" represents no more than monies other Federal Agencies have borrowed/taken from Social Security, and NONE ever have had any plan(s) in place to pay them back, thus the creation of "special" T-bonds.
" I do not think it means what you think it means. Find the existing funding, other than future taxes, or budget cuts. You won't, you can't, otherwise,
Either you know Social Security earns interest on their Treasuries that’s more than offset the negative cash flow, and you’re lying; or you don’t know, and you’re lying. Pretty sure it’s still lying even if you’re primarily deceiving yourself.
One, that’s not what you claimed:
Two, you keep using that quote. If you check, I do not think it means what you think it means. Social Security’s been solvent for decades.
Unfunded "trust fund"=insolvency since 2010 when Social Security started to pay out more than it took in
The "Trust Fund" represents no more than monies other Federal Agencies have borrowed/taken from Social Security, and NONE ever have had any plan(s) in place to pay them back, thus the creation of "special" T-bonds.
" I do not think it means what you think it means. Find the existing funding, other than future taxes, or budget cuts. You won't, you can't, otherwise,
STFU, and have a nice day.
.
Either you know Social Security earns interest on their Treasuries that’s more than offset the negative cash flow, and you’re lying; or you don’t know, and you’re lying. Pretty sure it’s still lying even if you’re primarily deceiving yourself.
They're paying interest. Yep, on unfunded "special" T-bonds.
Where's the funds/cash?
Keep looking, you're gettin' schooled.
Citation needed.
Find the funding.
There is none thus no citation(s)
Yes, I’m familiar with this inductive reasoning approach. It’s the same basic method you used to prove the cow jumped over the moon.