Oh, it looks like you've got some 'post-truth' on your teeth. Don't want to embarrass you, it's just hard to miss; what with all the grinning and everything.
Unless you really think someone having a gender or an ethnicity is the same thing as racial segregation, in which case you're an idiot, instead of a snickering bigot. Conceivably both, sure.
Just about done editing that comment yet? The reason I ask is because the last time I bothered to look, you were giggling over how you hadn’t really meant racial segregation. Which is a really surprising thing for you to try to get away with, because you specifically mentioned:
It’s worked so well for Dem’s black constituents.;-(
Or at least that’s what that comment used to say, anyway.
Your inability to converse without attribution, innuendo, or name calling illustrates your immaturity and simply displays ignorance of topic(s) addressed.
Oh, it looks like you've got some 'post-truth' on your teeth. Don't want to embarrass you, it's just hard to miss; what with all the grinning and everything.
Unless you really think someone having a gender or an ethnicity is the same thing as racial segregation, in which case you're an idiot, instead of a snickering bigot. Conceivably both, sure.
"Segregation" is not solely a racial phenomenon/issue,
"in which case you're the idiot".
Just about done editing that comment yet? The reason I ask is because the last time I bothered to look, you were giggling over how you hadn’t really meant racial segregation. Which is a really surprising thing for you to try to get away with, because you specifically mentioned:
Or at least that’s what that comment used to say, anyway.
It was obviously used as an example.
Your inability to converse without attribution, innuendo, or name calling illustrates your immaturity and simply displays ignorance of topic(s) addressed.
Both it is, then.