LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+30 30 0
Published 10 months ago with 2 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • leweb
    +4

    You know, I do think we need science news, as in bringing complicated science to the general public in a way that it is understood. No problem there. But turning science into clickbait is not the best way to do this. I'm getting really tired of seeing articles about how our understanding of the universe is going to be changed forever, or how biology's principles are about to be shattered, or how the whole field of chemistry is going down the toilet, etc. This does nothing to help science, in fact, it makes people less likely to think of science as a legitimate way to study the world, since it looks like the whole field is shattered and destroyed every time a potato farts.

    I know most people are stupid, and have the attention span of a mosquito with Alzheimer's, but we should at least try to be factual. Of course, that's not going to get us clicks, likes, and retweets.

    Maybe I'm just blowing against the sandstorm :/

    • AdelleChattre (edited 10 months ago)
      +4

      You’re right, of course. What’s more likely, the anomalies we caused by measurement error and sensor glitches, or that up is down, black is white and the second law of thermodynamics is more of a “sometimes thing?” While I won’t fault theoretical physics for indulging in self-serious thought experiments — especially when they’re trying to make a strong case for increased funding for a newer, bigger collider — this futurism.com article’s subhead is popsci red meat: “We’re about to lift the veil to a new universe.” New universe, same as the old universe.

Here are some other snaps you may like...