I'll get behind this if they allow the homeowner to remove any valuables in the property and get paid 10% over going rental rates for the area. We all know that isn't happening and that this is all a heavy handed absurd talking point to get the news talking on something other than the illegal upgrades to the building and the silencing of the people living there who knew months ago the building was unsafe and were told to shut up about it.
I'll get behind this if they allow the homeowner to remove any valuables in the property and get paid 10% over going rental rates for the area. We all know that isn't happening and that this is all a heavy handed absurd talking point to get the news talking on something other than the illegal upgrades to the building and the silencing of the people living there who knew months ago the building was unsafe and were told to shut up about it.
I’m not clear on why you think Jeremy Corbyn in particular would be furtively trying to hide how this happened and who tried to stop it happening. Was he, The Man, trying to suppress dopest tracks and all?