Not sure that discretion about the use of DDT amounts to genocide.
Nor is it clear you’ve been waiting for scientific consensus either. Seems like when you are confronted by the reality of ongoing man-made climate change, or science around it, you start in with your usual demands for “a yard stick, a rock or anything that has been under human observation for the past hundred years” that, if I can make any sense of this, somehow proves a negative to your stern satisfaction. What is that you’re asking for in those moments, anyway? I’ve got to ask. Everytime you go into that spiel, it gets to be like when adults talk in Charlie Brown specials.
Here, when a stalwart conservative scion of environmental policy mentions the elephant in the room, now you’re pining away for the advice of scientists and scholars? The same people you call “climate mongers?” The same ones you say are faking weather extremes so’s to gin up grant money? That’s who you demand to hear from, here, instead?
C’mon! Don’t be that way. Have the courage of your convictions. Clearly you’ve got a line of reasoning here. Let’s put the time and effort into making sense of it.
Say we pick a rock, like, say, the Sphinx, that’s been under observation for the past hundred years. What then? How does that prove or disprove anything?.It’s unclear how you get from that to what you say is logic that debunks man-made climate change. Set it out, if there’s anything to it. We’ve got time.
Not sure that discretion about the use of DDT amounts to genocide.
Nor is it clear you’ve been waiting for scientific consensus either. Seems like when you are confronted by the reality of ongoing man-made climate change, or science around it, you start in with your usual demands for “a yard stick, a rock or anything that has been under human observation for the past hundred years” that, if I can make any sense of this, somehow proves a negative to your stern satisfaction. What is that you’re asking for in those moments, anyway? I’ve got to ask. Everytime you go into that spiel, it gets to be like when adults talk in Charlie Brown specials.
Here, when a stalwart conservative scion of environmental policy mentions the elephant in the room, now you’re pining away for the advice of scientists and scholars? The same people you call “climate mongers?” The same ones you say are faking weather extremes so’s to gin up grant money? That’s who you demand to hear from, here, instead?
[This comment was removed]