+12 12 0
Published 8 years ago by AdelleChattre with 1 Comments
 
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • Muffintop (edited 8 years ago)
    +2

    The title is exaggerating, but it's a great article nevertheless. Cheaper antibodies that take less time to produce would be great. Yet, as the article mentioned, viruses do change and evolve. So, sooner or later, most antibodies would become inefficient and we would have to rush to develop new ones while ill patients are fighting the disease in hospitals.

    In this sense, what is more important is the development of "universal antibodies". These antibodies target parts of the virus that do no change that much. These would be especially important for diseases like HIV and influenza which are really good at changing to avoid antibody attacks. I've added a related scientific link, if you're interested in universal antibodies. Or here's a snap on universal flu vaccine (a nice read as well),

Here are some other snaps you may like...