• Rothulfossil
    +2

    I'm as much of a lily-livered, bleeding-heart, liberal, egghead communist as the next guy and I'm all for gun control, but I'm totally with the armed man in this case. As explained a couple times in this thread, birdshot is harmless on the way back down. He was justified.

    • GeniusIComeAnon
      +3

      Except that the video of the flight path clearly shows that the drone was over his house for seconds. The man with the gun had to have been waiting for it to pass. He's just paranoid that a drone flying quickly over his house at 200 feet up was somehow spying on his daughter.