LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+28 28 0
Published 2 years ago with 2 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • NinjaKlaus (edited 2 years ago)

    Why would the ISP's agree to continue anyway considering that the newest anti-piracy idea is suing the ISP for infringrement and they fricking won against Cox and it's on appeal.

  • zanduvid

    The larger problem are not torrent sites, but streaming sites because these are where the largest advertising money is made. No point going after the user who downloads the movies, go after the sites that make money for hosting the files and those who pay them, the advertisers (mostly software download sites, betting sites, dating sites, get-rich-quick schemes and the likes). Without ads, those sites make no money and without money, they can't afford servers, bandwidth,... so they would end up closing down their sites.

Here are some other snaps you may like...