Thank you
Your email has been added to our waiting list and we will send an invite to you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
In the meantime, if you happen to run a blog, our newly launched Blog Enhancement Suite can utilize the immense power of community to help you get more audience, engagement, content, and revenue with your own embeddable community! It will breathe new life into your blog and can automate many of the tedious tasks that come with the territory, so you can focus more on what matters most... writing.
Help spread the word about Snapzu:
Let others know about Snapzu by tweeting about us. We appreciate every mention!
Tweet it!
Join the Discussion
It's exciting to see some more aero helmet testing data, but Giro does have a valid point. The testing was completely sub par as far as scientific rigger goes. Testing one head position? Using the wrong size helmet? Not providing the raw values collected? If someone is going to all the trouble of testing and skip on basic details like that I would have to question to rest of their work. But to top it all off, their aero figures were averaged across all yaw angles? That's just poor data analysis.