Thank you
Your email has been added to our waiting list and we will send an invite to you as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
In the meantime, if you happen to run a blog, our newly launched Blog Enhancement Suite can utilize the immense power of community to help you get more audience, engagement, content, and revenue with your own embeddable community! It will breathe new life into your blog and can automate many of the tedious tasks that come with the territory, so you can focus more on what matters most... writing.
Help spread the word about Snapzu:
Let others know about Snapzu by tweeting about us. We appreciate every mention!
Tweet it!
Join the Discussion
Seems seriously flawed to me. Why take on the easy targets when there are so many issues with modern medicine. The study brings up so many questions. Some of the cancers show no better results for medicine compared with alternative therapies. The fact that they couldn't even identify which alternative therapy patients were using is a big problem. What if they had compared an alternative therapy to some unknown medical treatment?
This needs to be done as a proper double blind study with a control group before it has any credibility.
Because it's easier to do. Like calling chronic fatigue syndrome and irritable bowel syndrome functional all in your head stress induced bullshit rather than getting off your collective asses and doing some HARD WORK to find out the real causes of this stuff!