5 years ago
7
Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy
Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort held secret talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and visited around the time he joined Trump’s campaign, the Guardian has been told. Sources have said Manafort went to see Assange in 2013, 2015 and in spring 2016 – during the period when he was made a key figure in Trump’s push for the White House.
Continue Reading
https://www.theguardian.com
Join the Discussion
Remember the “Russia... if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing...” That was a call to action.
Cleverly, deep cover superspy Agent Trumpovich concealed his evil plan by hiding it in plain sight. Meanwhile, now we’re pretending that Clinton’s criminally negligent use of unsecured, private email service in her basement for compartmentalized state secrets was only an issue because of the perfidy of the Putin Nazis’ master hacker — codename Trumplestilskin?
Jesus, Mary, and Joseph: would it be so hard to oppose Trump on a policy basis? Democrats’ only move is this Cold War fanatic, military-cult, McCarthyist horseshit? That’s what you get for using diet vanilla Republicans for your Democratic nominee. Now pull the other one.
I'm glad to see you capitalized the names of The Holy Trinity, you're still going to hell for swearing though. Bernie said Trump has no political beliefs. Who in their right mind would believe in any political beliefs? I think there are none, just interests that change with those interests. Politicians and their shows are the Roman equivalence of Bread and Circuses, there for the amusement of the rabble.
I know. I feel really guilty about it.
“It is difficult to get a Democrat to understand something, when their ability to blow the next election depends upon their not understanding it!” — Summer Glau
I mean if you still don’t believe that Russia collusion happened, then explain why Trump’s campaign manager secretly met with Assange... I'll wait.
So on the basis of an unattributed, evidence-free, non-sequitur guilt-by-association claim, you demand we accept one particular conspiracy theory you want so very badly to believe? Can't argue with iron-clad logic like that. Couldn't even name a Russian? Pfft.
Reminds me of a friend I tried to stop from driving while wasted. "Why would there be the color pink if I was too drunk to drive?" he asked. So of course there was no choice but to let him drive off.
If you're that desperate for a theory to be true, shouldn't you be even more cautious around establishing whether it is? Or not.