LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+40 41 1
Published 2 years ago with 6 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • FivesandSevens
    +8

    Has anyone ever heard of oilprice.com before? What's its rep as a news source, who owns it, what kinds of big stories has it had before this, etc.?

    I want Hillary to face the music for any and all illegal risks she took with secure communications as much as anybody, but this article is so full of weasel words, implied-but-not-cited sources, and vague wording that I'm not inclined to give it much weight - especially if the site's biases and ownership are shrouded in as much smoke and mirrors as the article's "source."

    • Appaloosa
      +6

      http://oilprice.com/about-us Looks like they write a lot in the energy sector and get published in credible publications about energy. Maybe they don't like Hillary!

      • FivesandSevens (edited 2 years ago)
        +8

        Thanks. Just got back from researching the site myself. Seems legit, with mostly the natural bias toward fossil fuel-positive coverage. Doesn't really excuse the rumor-as-fact nature of the piece, but I guess that's not the site's primary MO.

        I don't like Hillary either, but I'm very wary of sources that play to that feeling, given all the shady sites that also don't like her. So I err on the side of caution when I can. A shared distrust of one person does not mean I want to give clicks or upvotes to Russian propaganda or paranoid far-right/far-left delusions.

  • RoamingGnome
    +7

    If this is true, she needs to be tried by a jury of her peers and put in prison for the rest of her life. But, she's a PTFEClinton, so nothing will stick. I truly despise these people; they are just disgusting filth. The fact that so many of my fellow Americans think Hillary and Donald are just awesome people, one of which should be POTUS, speaks volumes about my fellow Americans.

  • Gozzin
    +1

    Error 503 Service Unavailable

Here are some other snaps you may like...