LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+44 44 0
Published 6 days ago with 3 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • Amabaie
    +9

    Didn't see that coming, did we?

    • AdelleChattre
      +7

      Wait, a manufactured controversy isn't logically consistent? Yes Virginia, just think what would happen if the poors had weapons of imagined destruction? If anybody was going to spend thousands of dollars to make a shit version of what sells for orders of magnitude less every day, it's the underclass.

      Whether it's coded racism, 3d-printed guns or Democrats giving that dead horse the buckle end of their belt, I guess you just can't tell about your receivers.

  • 3rdWheel
    +5

    Real guns are already more dangerous to their owners than their intended targets. Why would this be any different?

Here are some other snaps you may like...