LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+39 39 0
Published 1 year ago with 4 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • NinjaKlaus

    One commissioner in particular, Justice Kennedy wrote, had crossed the line in saying that “freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust.”

    This is all they ruled on really, that the state violated the right to religion by using this in their arguments against the bakery. It doesn't really do anything except give these people a feel-good win that means nothing. Because...

    “Colorado law,” Justice Kennedy wrote in one, “can protect gay persons, just as it can protect other classes of individuals, in acquiring whatever products and services they choose on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other members of the public.”

    The real icing of this is that the bakery would be at fault for not serving gay people because the state has the right to require equal protection. All the state has to do is avoid making any statement on religion during their arguments.

  • puntacanna

    The problem with this ruling is it opens up discrimination to so many other things.

    • Nelson

      Open the flood gates of discrimination!

  • ubthejudge

    Welcome to an extremely slippery slope.

Here are some other snaps you may like...