LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+4 4 0
Published 6 months ago with 0 Comments

NATO doesn’t want to protect Baltics

  • NATO doesn’t want to protect Baltics

    NATO soldiers scare to be in the epicentre of a possible military conflict in the territory of the Baltic states. Most likely, they could become those who need to be saved, and not those who must protect.

    And that’s why…

    Soldiers clearly remember the words of former commanding general of US Army Europe General Ben Hodges: “Russia could conquer the Baltic states quicker than we could get there to defend them.” According to him 36 hours are enough to take over the capitals of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.

    He said that NATO could not mobilise its forces quickly enough to prevent their fall. He suggested that heavy military equipment such as tanks could not be moved fast enough from Western Europe to the alliance’s eastern flank.

    Today, both Washington and Moscow assign high strategic significance to the geographical location of the Baltic states. From Moscow’s perspective, the three states are located close to the strategic objects of the Russia, and therefore they are a potential targets for devastating attacks. For instance, the distance between Vilnius and Moscow is less than 500 miles – a short trip for a supersonic aircraft. From Washington’s perspective, the failure to protect the Baltic states from Russian aggression could lead to the destroying the NATO.

    Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian leaders are seeking additional NATO aid to help ward off any Russian moves against them, urging their member states to send more troops and bolster air defence on the Alliance’s eastern flank. But NATO is not planning on boosting its military presence in the Baltic countries, which have called for extra protection from their Russian neighbour.

    “Currently, we are not planning to increase our military presence in the region, but what we are planning is to strengthen our ability to reinforce if needed,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters after talks with Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte last week. “If there is a need, we need to have ready forces which can deploy very quickly,” Stoltenberg added.

    Let’s be honest with ourselves: at the moment NATO is not able to protect the Baltic states from any aggressor. The presence of NATO troops in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia is necessary only to calm local population. This is clear not only by locals, but also by foreign soldiers. Therefore, they are afraid of becoming victims of someone’s geopolitical game and do not want to defend the aliens’ houses.

    The Baltic Word

 

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment

Here are some other snaps you may like...