LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+15 15 0
Published 4 years ago with 0 Comments
  • While the linked post is more of an open-ended question rather than an attempt to provide an answer, I still think it's an interesting topic to bring up.

    Personally, I've always considered a problem of 'proof'. Basically, that someone on the dev side of things has to catch the person in the act. There are some ways you can catch people using specific programs, but a lot of work goes into hiding those, so in the end, you aren't going to come close to catching everyone cheating if you rely on automated detection.


Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment

Here are some other snaps you may like...