Someone's downvoted this as "Misleading / Clickbaity / Sensationalized" so I'll admit, I'm a bit curious. Of course whoever's done it has read the article, considered it on its merits, mulled it over perhaps consulting with local elders, past lovers, and faith-leaders before deciding they had to act. Perhaps they'd like to share with us the reasoning process and back-and-forth deliberations that comprised their conviction to cast this vote?

Unless it was a rash move made to scratch a sudden itch of conditioned fear and loathing, in which case we're not likely to hear from the opinion-voter in question. Too bad, so sad.