

8 years ago
2
Snowden: Surveillance is about “social control,” not terrorism
“To whom do you owe a bigger loyalty: to the law, or to justice?” Former NSA contractor spoke to packed theatre on Panama Papers, Bill C-51, and more. By Jamal Dumas and Max Hill.
Continue Reading
-
Private matter? That’s rich! Edward Snowden deals Cameron a Twitter takedown
David Cameron has been called out for hypocrisy by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden after the PM, who has presided over a raft of new surveillance powers, claimed his late-father’s tax affairs are “a private matter.” -
Golem XIV: Panama partners in crime
“We have broken no laws and cooperated with the government at all times.” Variations of that statement seem to be the default defence of everyone from bankers to politicians when their names come up in the Panama Papers. In the UK... -
Spies and Shadowy Allies Lurk in Secret Thanks to Firm’s Bag of Tricks
One day during his presidential re-election campaign in September 1996, Bill Clinton walked into a room in Westin Crown Center hotel in Kansas City, Mo. At stake was a quarter-million dollars in campaign fundraising. Clinton turned to his generous host, Farhad Azima, and led the guests in song...
Join the Discussion
I’m going with the last one being the most important here.
It's absolutely about social control, IMO. Michel Foucault, the influential philosopher-theorist with whom I have some disagreements but not on this subject, wrote a fascinating analysis of the place of surveillance in the construction of social power that I think really nails it. Here's a brief description of his work on the topic, and here's an excerpt from the study itself, Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. His description of his sometime-metaphor for surveillance by the powerful in society, the Panopticon prison model, has always made sense to me in this era of runaway NSA surveillance:
To Foucault surveillance is not really about whether you may do something to subvert social control, it's about the social control that comes from your knowledge that the powerful are watching you. He believed this awareness reinforced social control by ensuring you would never forget who holds power, and why their power is beyond your reach. One way to read his analysis is that hiding the fact of surveillance undermines its fundamental role in controlling society and concentrate power, though hiding the methods of surveillance may not. In this way of thinking, all our outrage and attempts to expose and bring down the NSA/Panopticon can be seen as actually reinforcing its power over us. His prescriptions for dealing with this situation are more complex, controversial, and (I think) difficult to support, but if anyone is still awake after reading this and interested in learning more, there's a ton of writing about it on the interwebs.