![](https://s2.storage.snapzu.com/89/2f/69/33/AdelleChattre/snaps/9f/cb/172495/thumbs/33ea1c08f0a600aa_fpi_large.jpg)
![](https://s2.storage.snapzu.com/89/2f/69/33/AdelleChattre/profile/eb6888bc0e57c269.jpg)
7 years ago
3
How to trump group-think in a post-truth world
When opinions are symbols of belonging, our brains work overtime to keep us believing, says Dan Kahan.
Continue Reading![](https://s0.storage.snapzu.com/favicons/n/a/t/u/www.nature.com.png)
Additional Contributions:
Join the Discussion
"Group think" in the classical sense has always needed a "source". In the past it was certainly always the press/media. Now that has finally been shrugged individuals, more than ever, recognize the press's inherent bias. Trump is not the "source" but rather the result of individual's realizations.
This election, is/was about a revolution against "group think", rather than an example.
Watch it, that self-satire is sharp. Oh! my stars. You’ve really nailed it with your one, and only, permissible understanding of groupthink. I particularly enjoy that you’re not going to allow for any heretical alternative interpretations, either. This builds on extensive comedic set-up of yours that’s also been very rewarding. Like that one time, when you corrected /u/NinjaKlaus’ perspective on the current oil market, as if only your specific view could conceivably hold any meaning. I know, right? Because if there’s anything that admits one and only one correct interpretation, right? It’s economics. Yet another sparkling facet of the comedy gem you are.
Why, thank you.;-)