parent
  • ubthejudge
    +3

    That's basically what digg did in version 4. And 3 days later they were history.

    • caelreth
      +2

      Did away with the down vote or tried to take other steps with it?

      • DastardlyVandal
        +1

        Downvotes, or as they called them "burying a post." Basically, in v4, they redid a large portion of the site, with many many bugs present, a UI that the majority of the users hated, and made it a better platform for advertising instead of making improvements to help the community. It was a problem that came about in part from them working towards making it something profitable (ala advertising) versus something the community built.

        Here is a link on reddit that discusses it a bit more in depth than what I'm able to, since it's all second hand on my part.