It's pretty incredible to think about how seven years ago, "Pokemon Go" completely captivated the world with its real-world gameplay. And now, the creators are gearing up to bring that same immersive experience to their new basketball game. While "Pokemon Go" had players exploring actual locations for virtual creatures, "NBA All-World" takes it to the streets, letting players challenge each other to games right out in the open. It's like a new level of real-world interaction in gaming. The idea of merging digital entertainment with the real environment is truly fascinating. Can't wait to see how "NBA All-World" brings the excitement of basketball to the streets!

I have over the air tv,but the programming (except for PBS) is so bad,I can't stand to watch it. More and more of it is just advertisements and reality shows,so I use You Tube for the most part. Networks,I think,will play the long game and eventually lock everything down.

Oh wow, ain't this wonderful news for gamers? I don't usually play Call of Duty but since it's now available on PlayStation, maybe I'll go ahead and give it a try. I just wish I have enough money to buy the game when it arrives.

This is like a game of brinkmanship. It will be interesting to see how it plays out, but I doubt Google will stop showing CBA and CTV content. If they do, they will drive more searches to Bing. I go to Google to avoid having to visit a dozen news sites individually.

According to the https://collectorpricing.org Yes, it's true! A Pokémon RPG is indeed coming to the Nintendo Switch. The president and CEO of The Pokémon Company, Tsunekazu Ishihara, announced during Nintendo's E3 2017 Direct presentation that the Switch would be getting a mainline entry in the Pokémon series. Fans of the franchise were thrilled to hear this news and eagerly awaited further updates on the game's development. It's exciting to see Pokémon making its way onto the Switch platform, offering players a new and immersive RPG experience in the beloved Pokémon world.

This is a very, very dangerous game being played here.

Do you want to play a game?

Thanks for yet another way to be absolutely not productive. :-) Now, let's decrypt some more! ;-)

Edit: why is there no option to save a game? %@#&

I just restarted playing the first game again. Remastered edition. I am still so impressed with this game. So good.

Looking at all the ridiculous low fines these huge ass companies get, you'd think that their money and power seems above the law. Just look at what they got their tiny fine for: not securing their customers' money, which is in total even way more than their gross profit. More or less up for grabs for a bit of a decent hacker. And let's face it: yearly billions get stolen from banks and financial institutions. And never return, also.

Let me explain. I have a cousin who was for years the network manager for Fortis (and ABN Amro), two "small" players in the banking world. He was responsible for everything computer network in the BeNeLux of those institutions. No matter how hard they tried to harden the safety of their networks and computers (including all kinds of encryption), an average of 250 to 450 million Euro got stolen every year. Every. Year. I kid you not. Let that sink in. Extrapolate that to all the institutions all over the world. That's billions every year. Now, it's understandable that doesn't hit the news all too much, because that's really shitty publicity, but it's money that does not belong to those institutions. It belongs to their clients. From hedgefund managers to mom-and-pop-shop owners, from hard working people to pensioners.

And from that perspective you shouldn't trust banks or financial institutions and the government should seriously step up their game to hold banks and financial institutions responsible for their (conscious) negligence.

Sitting down in front of a computer or looking at a phone is one thing. Putting headgear on to play a game is not something I'd want to do, and the price makes it seem even less appealing! The article itself was great, very well-written journalism. I love the reporting and the choice of article here, I just can't imagine myself wanting to use a headset to access the metaverse.

Arguably the most famous cheat-code in history is The Konami Code. Its notoriety stems from the fact that the Japanese publisher placed this code into more than 100 of its games get all cheat codes guide at cheatcommands . For each game it was included in, it would unlock a completely new feature.

Steam even has game for us Linux users,but most games I just don't care about.

How about that..I did enjoy that game.

It's definetely an overload, yes. I visit regularly several websites for my binge-watch-cravings and they offer really a lot of series and films from all providers. The majority of the content quality correlates to the quality of the majority of the regular internet and is slightly better than the average social media outlet.
That being said, once every few weeks I play a game of chicken with a movie which I select by searching on numerical reviews. One out of five stars, less than 4 out of 10, you get the idea. The chicken part is about how long I can stand the movie until I turn it off, because of several things like acting quality, special effects, soundtrack, et cetera.

I agree that it's up to companies to make the commute worthwhile. When people had to be in the office to get the job done, it was fair game to demand that employees pay for their commute. But the game has shifted. If one can do the work equally well at home or at the office, why should employees be made to pay for a commute demanded by the employer?

Microsoft has always played the long game.

They don't care. The end game is for this country to be a fascist theocracy.

Valve's so called monopoly has saved me money with the regular holiday sales, time by not needing to find a disk or hunt down a no-cd patch, and it was great not needing 50 different stores. These days I now have Bethesda, Gog, Ubisoft, EA Play, Xbox/Microsoft, Blizzard, Paradox, Social Club, Epic, and Steam stores or launchers. It's absurd and intrusive how things are now, my opinion.

I think steam was more like Netflix than a monopoly, it was just the best most convenient place to get things when there happened to be no competition. Today this lawsuit almost has to fail because of all the other stores that are out.

I hated Steam when it came out, I still have a slight hatred for it, but I will never like this new system of a launcher/store for every game. I miss the days of installing a game with serial codes.

If there is support interest for a game or platform, you can bet savvy game hackers will find a way to keep things going elsewhere off grid.

It is still very broken - which is a bummer as I still have a ton of side missions and also the main finale quest... I just want a playable game. (PS5 and XBOX Series X) player here.

But that $78 million is basically worthless outside of the game

what you said was a blatant lie

whoa! hey let's keep it civil

sorry to butt in with points of order but i now have skin in this game because i read snapzu specifically to not read people namecalling

the person you are replying to could very well be misinformed according to an Elle magazine piece about an interview on a MSNBC of Katie Porter

however, NoWearingPants on snapzu is a source i have every bit of trust in as Katie Porter on MSNBC (in fact, i have more experience with and trust from interacting with NoWearingPants than Katie Porter - whom i never heard of before)

so to call one of them a blatant liar is, in itself, misleading and granting some kind of credibility to one source over the other

not to mention completely out of line

granted i havent checked NotWearingPants' notes but I have not checked MSNBC's talking head's notes either so let's just go with that both pieces of information could be true and either of them could be false and that the truth is probably not be found in accusing one of them of lying

First of all: melodramatic much? “Doomsday device”

A corporation run by a manchild on short leash from investors? Come off it

this tool is as nothing more than the guttennburg press equivalent for the 21st century and nothing more

it could have been a way to torpedo the rich and powerful but that ship has sailed since we sold it out to them (virtually from day one might I add)

this article is so off that mark that it hardly qualifies as an opinion

more like eternal September first ever essay “hai government regulators are like violence - if they are not working it’s because we are not using enough, i can haz into forum post?”

There’s a notion that the social web was once useful, or at least that it could have been good, if only we had pulled a few levers: some moderation and fact-checkingy here, a bit of regulation there, perhaps a federal antitrust lawsuit. But that’s far too sunny and shortsighted a view

Please

that is the sunny outlook? Oh my...

Let me burst that bubble for ya champ: the notion that social web once was good is BS

geeks have been explaining this one from day one of the advent of so-called social media platforms

it’s always been a fallacy and is now standard fair - the dogma that The Problem is the wild, wild west of the worldwide web

nothing could be further from the truth

on the contrary - any system with a single database under the control of a single legal entity is the very antithesis of an open net; it is the subversion of the idea of a free association network where everyone has the right and means to publish uncensored information

that’s fundamental and first and foremost - if your post doesn’t get that right the rest is either self aggrandising drivel or paid-for promo

the fact that people are now trying to regulate this very same database under the watchful eye of oversight committees (under the thinly veiled guise of “public outcry”) is mere endgame political posturing of a long term strategy - over three decades in the making - to reign in free exchange of information that the Pandora’s box of World Wide Web opened up; in spite of every effort by APRANET’s paymasters to design monitoring into the very fabric of the TCP/IP infrastructure

and every advent into the network design to make it more distributed has been downplayed and shot down ever since

just as every advent which makes it more restrictive and corruptible has been promoted and hailed as good

illegal exchange of ideas notwithstanding (drug trafficking; illegal pornographers et al) - all information exchange on a free network would be monitored by law enforcement in any case

this was never in doubt

a single database approach only makes it easier to identify and keep watch over the neutral players which constitute the bulk of the masses and data traffic on the internet; exchanges of garden variety, regular run of the mill information like food recipes and service complaints (interestingly enough about big business and government)

in other words - Facebook-like facilitation of Internet-based communications does nothing to deter or prevent people exchanging harmful information and gives only the power to big player agents to intervene and monitor and/or incite outrage of mass populous when it suits them and for a price

which makes it both profitable and exclusive to those that can afford it

this final nail in the coffin only serves to outlaw all other possible channels which hav...

Tribalism is bad, but hey we just bought a major game publisher and they are going to make their games bigger, better and best with our ecosystem... so don't buy that PS5 eh.