Of course they're comparable. I'm curious to know why you think they wouldn't be? I'm also slightly curious as to why you felt the need to post a link to the Hillary Clinton interview, considering it was the first video in the comment you were replying to?
On an slightly related note, for people who read this, the time-stamp link apparently doesn't work with the player here on Snapzu. If you click the eye icon the video starts from the beginning, but if you click the link and watch it on YouTube it starts at the right place.
Wow. A Presidential candidate mentioning the possible assassination of their opponent? That's just terrible...
Hillary Clinton in 2008
Chris Matthews
Keith Olbermann
More from MSNBC on Hillary's Comment
Chris Wallace
I'm curious if you think the two are directly comparable?
https://youtu.be/t1RA7awOSwM?t=2408 (full speech starting at the 2nd amendment segway)
and the clinton interview from 2008 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0QAewVrR28
Of course they're comparable. I'm curious to know why you think they wouldn't be? I'm also slightly curious as to why you felt the need to post a link to the Hillary Clinton interview, considering it was the first video in the comment you were replying to?
On an slightly related note, for people who read this, the time-stamp link apparently doesn't work with the player here on Snapzu. If you click the eye icon the video starts from the beginning, but if you click the link and watch it on YouTube it starts at the right place.
Specificity of context mostly.
Fair enough.
Thank you for this tech info
Looks like the time argument is being clobbered on submission, the raw video id is parsed and embedded into the class only.