So republican probe finds wrong-doing by democrats. Not saying that there wasn't wrong-doing but it's not exactly an unbiased probe.
Using that logic, having Democrats say there's no wrong-doing isn't exactly unbiased either. If all she's got is an ad hominem defense then she's got no defense.
Why does it have to be unbiased? Her and her acolytes broke the law. Period. Anybody who refuses to see it is either stupid or willfully ignorant.
So republican probe finds wrong-doing by democrats. Not saying that there wasn't wrong-doing but it's not exactly an unbiased probe.
Using that logic, having Democrats say there's no wrong-doing isn't exactly unbiased either. If all she's got is an ad hominem defense then she's got no defense.
Why does it have to be unbiased? Her and her acolytes broke the law. Period. Anybody who refuses to see it is either stupid or willfully ignorant.