parent
  • fred (edited 8 years ago)
    +1

    Having these systems in place and getting the software in the hands of normal users months early have really given these people a very real and very complete view of the entire operating system pre-release. There are more than a million people that are memebers of the Insider Program, a great many who have experience with the new operating system. I think if you'd ask most of them their thoughts on specific things my sentiments on the matter would be echoed loudly. Before Win 8.1 we didn't have a system for regular users to touch the software pre-release outside of controlled environments and the number of people seeing/using/and testing the software was limited and usually bias, so when you say:

    There is a simple flaw in some of these programs however. These are not typical users, even a million of them. These are not the 95% of people in the world that will have to deal with the OS, so the true test comes in its supportability and useability for these folks. That is all im saying.

    it is pretty standard for a subset of individuals to make extraordinary claims pre-release

    I don't really think that applies to the Win10 generation of operating systems.

    Sure it does. You are doing it youself. You even admitted as much in your original comment. It applies with all new tech.

    "Microsoft Expert here, here are the cold stone facts about Windows 10 that have been proven by a double blind trial study which has been peer reviewed."

    I....uh....never said that. Not sure where its being quoted from. You have an opinion, its and pretty enthusiastic. I also have an opinion, based much more on indifference to OS but more with experience. There is nothing wrong with either opinion, neither is right or wrong (mostly - i do take issue with "record setting security features" on a couple levels but i digress.).