LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica

SMcIntyre's feed

  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    There is nothing subjective about this. Solitary confinement is not torture. That is fact.

    There have been numerous challenges over the years, and while various courts- including the Supreme Court, have found individual cases where specific jails/prisons have acted inappropriately, Solitary Confinement as a practice, has never been found to be unconstitutional. That is fact.

    Solitary confinement is a structured, and carefully managed program used to deal with problem inmates, it's not Shawshank.

  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    Congrats, I'm certain you deserved it. Still doesn't make it torture.

  • 7 months ago
    Conversation SMcIntyre
    This comment has gained traction and has turned into a conversation.

    I know this is a difficult concept for some people to grasp-- particularly people like Chelsea Manning who seem to think that rules don't apply to them, but actions have consequences. Choices have consequences.

    Chelsea Manning chose to break the law: She chose to disobey orders. She chose to violate the Espionage Act by stealing, and then delivering to WikiLeaks, hundreds of thousands of classified/sensitive documents and files. This twenty-three-year-old, who flunked out of community college, took it upon herself to decide what was in the best interests of U.S. National Security. She decided to say: "Fuck the chain of command, fuck the law, fuck the Army, fuck the Defense Department, fuck the entire Intelligence Community, fuck the Commander-In-Chief, and fuck Congress, because I know better than all of them." That was her choice. No one did this to her, she put herself in this situation.

    After she was caught, arrested, tried, and convicted, you would've thought that she'd have learned her lesson, but what does she do? She goes to prison and decides, yet again, that rules are for other people, and that she doesn't have to follow them if she doesn't want to. So now she gets to spend the next several months, if not years, in a cold, dark room, all by her lonesome, because she can't seem to grasp a concept as simple as: "You have to follow the rules". Again, that was her choice. She did this to herself.

  • 7 months ago
    Achievement SMcIntyre

    Snaptivist

    Has had their comment turn into a conversation 2/2 times! Congratulations SMcIntyre on this achievement!

    +7400 XP
  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    I don't give shit if she violated the rules of the prison; solitary confinement is torture.

    Solitary confinement is not torture, and anyone who thinks it is has no clue what they're talking about. Period.

     

    As to the avenues that we have for whistleblowing. Yeah, right. I live in the real world, and in the real world Manning would have been killed before that information was allowed to go public.

    Apparently you live in fantasy land.

  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    Since I don't have control over the candidates running for office or who votes for candidates outside my district, the former isn't really an option.

    No one ever said changing the country was easy. If you want easy, go get a paper route. Real change is never easy, and damn sure isn't quick. After the pilgrims hit Plymouth Rock, it took almost another 160 years before America told England to piss off, and we fought a war to do it. It was over 130 years after the abolitionist movement started in the U.S. before slavery ended, and we fought a war to do that to. There was over a decade and a half between Brown v. The Board of Education and the Civil Rights Act, and while it wasn't a war, it certainly had plenty of blood and a body count. It was almost half a century between the Stonewall Inn and Obergefell, and that too was a less than peaceful process. Change is absolutely possible, but only for those willing to put in the work.

     

    I've done what I can to support organizations supporting good candidates, but I don't have the sort of resources like Sheldon Adelson and the Koch Brothers to buy elections.

    Or George Soros and Tom Steyer (careful, your bias is showing).

     

    Those people have also learned the value of a good disinformation program which is why we're still struggling with bullshit like climate change denialism.

    We still have to deal with bullshit like climate denial for the same reason we still have organized religion: Cognitive Dissonance. People would rather invent comforting illusions rather than face uncomfortable facts.

     

    The practice of indefinite solitary confinement is being challenged as a method of torture.

    And if/when the courts decide that it shouldn't be used anymore then she'll be placed back in a regular cell. But I wouldn't hold your breath on that one, because solitary confinement isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

     

    Her treatment in prison is a result of people feeling like she doesn't deserve any rights as a prisoner. That's not justice, that's vengeance.

    Nope, still wrong. Her treatment is a result of her breaking the rules. This isn't Sandals® Kansas, it's a Federal Prison. There are things you're not allowed to have, and certain ways you're expected to behave. She chose to have contraband in her cell. She chose to fight with the guards when they tried to remove her from her cell. Those were her choices- nobody else's, and now she has to live with the consequences.

    show moreshow less
  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    This is why turnover is extremely low. We're not electing leaders who are willing to compromise to get things done any longer, and gridlock is the inevitable result.

    Your problem isn't with the process, it's with the people. As I said before, either find better candidates, or do a better job of selling your message.

     

    No, but they're also prohibited from cruel and unusual punishment. It says so in the Eighth Amendment. Even disobeying orders, committing espionage, compromising national security and endangering the lives of anyone doesn't strip her of that right.

    Nothing that's being done to her even comes close to qualifying as an Eighth Amendment violation . Cruel & Unusual punishment has a set legal standard, with four basic elements:

    The punishment can't be arbitrary. She was granted due process, afforded legal representation, and was tried and convicted at Court Martial.

    The punishment must be used commonly. Prison is the standard form of punishment for criminal activity in the U.S., and solitary confinement is a standard form of punishment in every prison in the country.

    The punishment can't be unnecessarily harsh. Given that she was facing a maximum of 90 years in prison, there is nothing at all harsh about 35 years, especially considering she'll be eligible for parole in another 8 years. Likewise, there is nothing unnecessarily harsh about solitary confinement. When you have someone who is already in prison, who still won't obey the rules, and is a danger to themselves and others, then solitary confinement is absolutely necessary.

    The punishment can't have been rejected by society. Both prison and solitary confinement are widely accepted by society.

     

    Such empathy. Does landing in prison automatically strip a convict of any right to dignity? Is American justice supposed to focus more on justice or vengeance? Because this sounds more like vengeance.

    This didn't happen to her because she landed in prison. This happened to her because, once again, she decided that rules don't apply to her. She decided that she could do as she pleased. Clearly, she was wrong.

    show moreshow less
  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    When the government has become so corrupt and subservient to special interests, someone has to challenge it.

    That's a bullshit excuse. We do challenge the government, frequently. There's a reason why we have the old election cliche: "Every two years we get to go overthrow the Government", because we do. If you think the Government is so corrupt, then go find a candidate you consider honorable and run 'em, or run yourself. Take your message to the people. If you're right, and the Government is so corrupt, then you shouldn't have any trouble convincing others. Grassroots candidates win all the time. Hell, right now, there's a better than 50/50 chance that the Speaker of the House is going to lose his Primary tomorrow and not even be on the ballot in November. Go and do likewise.

     

    Chelsea Manning did that and is now being abused and tortured.

    She disobeyed orders, committed espionage against the United States, compromised National Security, and endangered the lives of who knows how many members of the military, foreign operatives, members of the intelligence community, and American Citizens. Do you think they're going to give her a fucking cookie and say "good for you"?

    She's in prison because she deserves to be. She's in solitary confinement because she deserves to be, since she won't obey Prison rules.

    show moreshow less
  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    No she didn't. The government put her in solitary confinement.

    She put herself in prison by breaking the law, and she put her self in solitary by violating the rules of the Prison.

     

    Those are the people who should be in jail.

    That very well may be, but that absolutely does not change the fact that she broke the law. There are mechanisms in place for reporting crimes in the military, even ones committed by the military. Likewise the Federal Government has a method for reporting crimes committed by the Federal Government. Neither method includes stealing classified information and delivering it to a foreign national and a member of the media.

  • 7 months ago
    Comment SMcIntyre

    I know this is a difficult concept for some people to grasp-- particularly people like Chelsea Manning who seem to think that rules don't apply to them, but actions have consequences. Choices have consequences.

    Chelsea Manning chose to break the law: She chose to disobey orders. She chose to violate the Espionage Act by stealing, and then delivering to WikiLeaks, hundreds of thousands of classified/sensitive documents and files. This twenty-three-year-old, who flunked out of community college, took it upon herself to decide what was in the best interests of U.S. National Security. She decided to say: "Fuck the chain of command, fuck the law, fuck the Army, fuck the Defense Department, fuck the entire Intelligence Community, fuck the Commander-In-Chief, and fuck Congress, because I know better than all of them." That was her choice. No one did this to her, she put herself in this situation.

    After she was caught, arrested, tried, and convicted, you would've thought that she'd have learned her lesson, but what does she do? She goes to prison and decides, yet again, that rules are for other people, and that she doesn't have to follow them if she doesn't want to. So now she gets to spend the next several months, if not years, in a cold, dark room, all by her lonesome, because she can't seem to grasp a concept as simple as: "You have to follow the rules". Again, that was her choice. She did this to herself.

    show moreshow less