• Canada (edited 7 years ago)
    +6

    I'm pretty sure a five year old could slam him. You need a third candidate. The current system is just plain bad.

    • ttubravesrock
      +5

      we have plenty of candidates. we need a ranked voting system.

      Your first choice counts as 3 points, your second choice counts as 2 points, and your third choice counts as 1 point.

      I'm sure a more intricate point scale would have to be developed to accurately gauge voting weight, but the idea comes across easier with 321.

    • RoamingGnome (edited 7 years ago)
      +4

      We had one. He was awesome. But, the People are stupid sheep who are incapable of independent, critical thinking who believe everything the lying pieces of shit in the media tell them, so the best candidate since Kennedy was shut down.

      What we need is accountability in the media. It will never happen.

      Edit- And election reform. I do not now, nor will I ever, believe that Hillary won California. I believe the election was rigged, 100%.

    • [Deleted Profile]

      [This comment was removed]

    • Appaloosa
      +3

      I'm pretty sure those other 5 year old billionaires are doing that, and us 5 year olds are going to get screwed either way.